Thursday, March 7, 2013

THE BALKANIZATION OF AMERICA RANT


                                                                               

Remember all those years ago when the former Yugoslavia was all over the news virtually all the time? We were bombarded day and night with story after story of blood, guts, gore, and mayhem. The Chechnyans were killing the Serbs who were slaughtering the Bosnians who were butchering everyone they could find from a place called Kosovo. One religious group was pitted against another while both, of course, claimed that God was on their side and ethnic rivalries spilled over into bloody and brutal hostility. The images were horridly graphic and the profiles of individual tragedies were truly heart- rending. I remember discussing with friends and acquaintances how this could happen in a formerly united nation. How could it get to a point where entire villages were wiped out, neighbor fought and killed neighbor, and family members found themselves on opposite sides? I distinctly remember a Friday afternoon at our local watering hole where a bunch of us were watching a documentary about the mess taking place halfway around the world. The general consensus seemed to be that at least that kind of thing could never happen here in the United States of America – not in the good old U.S. of A. After all, we’re much too civilized to allow that kind of brutality to take place and our system of government has too many safe-guards built into it to permit that kind of horror from occurring here.



Well, not wanting to be a fly in the ointment or perhaps a monkey in the wrench, I reminded the group that it already has happened here and it was just as violent and bloody as what we were witnessing on our nightly news programs. They told me I was being ridiculous and that these kinds of horrific events simply did not happen in civilized, western societies like the United States. These atrocities took place among the less enlightened, the less sophisticated, and those whose first response to problem solving is violent blood-letting. I pointed out that our own American Revolution matched any of the violence and bloodshed that we viewed on television while we serenely sipped cocktails and dined on pub snacks. Back then, Americans killed Americans, villages were destroyed, and families torn asunder. The only difference, it seemed to me, was that the weapons were not nearly as sophisticated and efficient as those we use today. Additionally, I noted that less than a century later we had this little internal squabble known as the Civil War over that slavery-states’ rights thing. During that “brouhaha” a mere 700,000 Americans killed one another and once more claimed that God was on their side.



Horrific and brutal violence is certainly not unknown to Americans and we too have slaughtered one another with seeming abandon and, at times, enthusiasm. The examples cited erupted onto violence only when the differences between the sides involved seemed utterly insurmountable and irreconcilable. Certainly, prior to both conflicts efforts were made to find peaceful, nonviolent, and non-lethal solutions but unfortunately to no avail. The group told me that was then and this is now and insisted that I stick my paranoia where the sun don’t shine and have another drink. I considered the wisdom of their suggestion and, of course, dutifully complied. The thought, however, that it could still happen here just wouldn’t let go. How could something like Balkanization happen in the United States in the 21st Century given our common history, language, and culture? Aren’t we all Americans with similar desires and needs? Don’t we all want to see what is best for ourselves, our families, and communities? Aren’t we all in the end Americans or have we become a nation of “us vs. them?” Have we become merely a country of separate and disparate groups striving to pursue their own rather narrow interests at the expense of and to the detriment of the whole?



If that is indeed the case, the future of our nation is not nearly as sanguine as it once was and is in fact somewhat uncertain and precarious. As I considered the issue, it occurred to me that we are no longer a particularly united nation but are perhaps more divided than at any time in our history. The common bonds of language, culture, and borders – so crucial to the existence of a united and harmonious country and future – seem to be crumbling at alarming rates. I believe that the disharmony and discord that we increasingly witness is both purposeful and strategic. By constantly accentuating and aggravating the differences and disparities that exist between and among the various groups and sub-sets in our country, harmony and rationality are all but impossible. The constant and deliberate pitting of one against the other can only raise animosity, tension, and discord to the point of suspicion and open hostility that allows little if any room for compromise and cooperation. It seems to me that the single, most guilty entity amongst us is what I have dubbed the LFE (Liberal Fucking Elite) in the United States. These are the folks on the very Far Left in America and while they certainly do not constitute even close to a majority, they have an influence far beyond their numbers.



That group effectively controls most if not all of the nation’s major institutions. Among others, these include: our educational system from pre-K through graduate school; all major news and media outlets; arts and entertainment; and the country’s political apparatus on local, state, and national levels. These Leftists and Statists, then, have a virtual lock on shaping and molding public opinion and thought on literally every major issue and trend that comes before the American public at any given time in any given sphere. They frame the issues and define the debate concerning any and all matters of importance to Americans and America. Additionally, they are led by the most radical, Socialist, and completely unqualified President it has ever been our misfortune to see elected in the history of the nation. President Barry Boy epitomizes the essence of the LFE and Far Left Liberalism. His agenda since day one has been to use the old military tactic of divide and conquer – to set one group or interest against another – and reap the spoils of the discord and antagonism that he purposely creates and fosters. He does not want a unified and harmonious nation but must, instead, do all he can to sow discontent, discord, frustration, and anger among as many different groups and interests as he can. This is and has been his battle plan since as far back as his “community organizing” days in Chicago. That tactic got this virtually unknown, incompetent, no talent Buffoon his second term in office.



He sets rich against poor in order to create and harbor a feeling of jealousy and class envy among the so-called “Have-Nots” who are conditioned to believe that the successful amongst us have reached their position in life by dint of lying, cheating, stealing, and otherwise abusing the weakest and most vulnerable in society. He exacerbates racial tensions between black and white to enforce the lie that blacks in America are still living as slaves with no constitutional protections. He and his minions also ramp up the discord between blacks and Hispanic minorities and has them blaming white America for all of their problems. The Divider-in-Chief forever stirs up animosity between the American citizen and our ever growing illegal alien population by dangling the amnesty carrot which would mean “entitlements” for those that don’t deserve them in the hopes of increasing his party’s voter base. The Bamster constantly creates friction between his fellow one-worlders and American nationalists who view this country with pride and gratitude. He regularly attempts to ramp up the hostility that exists between those who favor an ever larger, more intrusive government against those who insist on a smaller, limited, constitutional republic as envisioned by our Founders all those years ago. He pits Capitalist against Socialist and those who see the United States as the greatest source for good in planetary history and those who view it as an unmitigated source of evil and suffering. He views America as an oppressor of humanity while most Americans know that we have been the world’s leading liberator of the poor and downtrodden.



This list could go on indefinitely, but the point is made. The Anointed One wants to create as much discord and disharmony as he can for that fits his overall template of bringing our great nation to its knees as a just punishment for, in his view, all the evil and unfairness we have foisted on the people of this planet. He views it has our “comeuppance.” This, folks, can accurately be described as Balkanization. Have we reached that level of discord and acrimony that will boil over into rivers of blood running down our streets? Not yet, but there have been a number of violent incidents associated with Obama’s divide and conquer approach to governance. Do you remember the antagonism and violence associated with the Occupy Wall Street mob of spoiled middle class college kids? How about the intimidation of voters in Philadelphia by the New Black Panther Party? Do not forget that a number of Tea Party types have been physically attacked for expressing their political views. Who can forget the huge rallies during which illegal Mexican aliens made demands on American citizens while waving their flag and burning ours?



There have been other examples but thus far they have been relatively few and far between. There is absolutely no guarantee, however, that they’ll stay that way. As the LFE constantly and purposely continues to pit group against group and increase the tension and hostility between and among them, the likelihood of increased violence and bloodshed will grow. Most Americans can’t or won’t fathom that outcome for it’s just too foreign to our experience. Remember, however, the utter horror show that was the Balkans did not ignite immediately. Neither did the American Revolution or Civil War. It took many decades for conditions to boil over into massive death and destruction and I have an ominous and sinking feeling that we have definitely started down that road.



An article entitled, “The Balkanization of America; Can We Survive?(www.intellectualconservative.com),” states that the, “American Heritage Dictionary describes Balkanization as the dividing of a region or territory into small often hostile units, as in the political division of the Balkans in the early 20th century.” Author R.B. Cox maintains that the, “United States of America is more frequently and vehemently becoming more Balkanized than at any time in its modern history.” The writer continues that, “Many will say it is just politics but it is much more than that. It is deep seated and goes to the fundamental core beliefs of people. Some say it is a culture war but this war is for the very soul of America.” Well now, that sounds quite dramatic doesn’t it? That doesn’t make it any less true nor does it make it irrelevant. The author queries, “Will an America so divided on values, morals and the place of God in society remain one nation under God or continue to become the Balkanized States of North America?” The author asks because he introduces yet additional divisions in our society not yet discussed here. He accurately maintains that there, “are those who believe in moral absolutes vs. those who don’t; the secular vs. the religious; the ones shocked at the halftime antics of a Super Bowl and those who were not.” These divisions exist in America as well as those already mentioned above and illustrate just how divided we have become.



According to a piece entitled, “The Balkanization of America(www.proconservative.net),” Balkanization constitutes the separation of a region into hostile units as occurred in the Balkans in the 20th Century. The author notes that this happens, “when you fill up a country with diverse groups who have little in common,” and he uses the former Yugoslavia as a primary and obvious example. He explains that when that country broke apart, “a three-way civil war ensued in which thousands were slaughtered. People who once were neighbors became blood enemies overnight. This is what happens to a country in which different ethnicities do not assimilate and assume one common ethnic identity.” Whether we wish to admit it or not, this is exactly what is happening in America and it has been occurring since at least 1965 when the Fat Liberal Drunk from Massachusetts rammed his immigration act down our throats. That act alone, I believe, sealed our nation’s fate and forever changed America for the worse and will in the end destroy the United States as historically founded.



The act mandated, among many other things, that fully 85% of immigrants to this country must originate from places like Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, or other Third World shitholes whose citizens have virtually no experience with democracy, self-government, or western civilization. They did not in far too many cases come here to be Americans but rather to acquire the “goodies” available to them at literally no charge. They bring their culture, traditions, and languages with them and never let go. They set up enclaves all over this country and their allegiance remains with their homeland instead of transferring to the United States. This is perhaps somewhat understandable for those that came from another place but not two or three generations later. Immigrants in huge numbers stopped assimilating leading the author of the above piece to, “admit being uncomfortable at the eclipse of George Washington and the Founding Fathers,” and, “to the attacks on European culture at our major universities.” He further notes that he is, “doubly offended when people pretend that some multicultural idea, attaching to thinly disguised Socialism, is upheld as Americanism.”



The constant, ceaseless Far Left emphasis on multiculturalism and diversity as the highest of virtues is, in fact, Balkanizing and therefore destroying this nation. They deemphasize and belittle the common bonds that we as Americans have historically held and that have bound us together to a common proud and shared past and a future that is both optimistic and confident. In fact, the LFE’s never ending harping on the pillars of multiculturalism and diversity do nothing less than highlight and emphasize our differences and ignore our bonds of unity. Elevating multiculturalism and diversity as the highest of virtues coupled with political correctness makes it literally impossible to speak honestly and openly about serious and destructive issues that we as a nation must confront. To criticize or to find fault with ideas and concepts like diversity and multiculturalism can be devastating if not actually dangerous. To state out loud and in public objections to these dual pillars of Liberalism is to invite public ridicule and demonization of the most extreme nature. Just walk into virtually any student union on any university campus and begin explaining why you believe multiculturalism and diversity are actually dangerous to America’s future and get ready to run like Hell!



At the very least, you’ll be cursed at, called a racist and a bigot, and perhaps be forced into a Sensitivity Training Session in some Liberal gulag. Our universities, for the most part, have become hotbeds of intolerance for anything but the “party” line and to express any thought or idea that doesn’t fit into the prescribed orthodoxy can have anything from unpleasant to dire consequences. Should you dare to express the opinion, for example, that it’s time to seriously limit immigration to our country or perhaps stop it altogether for a set period, you’d better be wearing body armor. You’ll once again be accused of racism along with xenophobia and jingoism. You’ll be told in no uncertain terms that you’re nothing more than an outdated, intolerant nationalist who doesn’t understand the concept that no one culture is better than any other and that expressions of nationalism and love of country will no longer be tolerated in our brave new world of 21st Century America. This tactic and strategy is literally codified in Saul Alinsky’s Rule Book for Radicals in which he states that one must completely and utterly demonize any perceived enemy because once he or it is universally hated and despised it is ever so much easier to destroy that enemy. The enemy is literally dehumanized and turned into a monster and monsters must not be permitted to exist.



This is exactly what happened to Jews in Germany under old Adolph’s reign of terror. The same tactics are used against Conservatives in America today. We are thoroughly demonized by the LFE. If, for example, we object to the current state of our so-called immigration policy we become hated anti-immigrationists who have absolutely no compassion for the world’s poor and persecuted. If we object to policies like Affirmative Action, why then we must obviously be racists. If we are against abortion on moral grounds, then we must be anti-choice and anti-women. This is done purposely to put Conservatives on the defensive and force them to defend themselves when in fact none is necessary.



No one likes to be called a racist, anti-immigrant, or anti-female but when you claim that you are none of these things you immediately become suspect and are assumed to be guilty of some great evil or sin. It’s difficult if not impossible to defend any point of view from a position of weakness. This is “Alinskyism” and you should know, if you don’t already, that Alinsky is one of Obama’s heroes and role models. Following the Alinsky-Obama template can lead to no where but the Balkanization of America. It is a strategy of division and disunification. It ensures animosity between and among the disparate groups and sub-sets that live in this country. This template absolutely mitigates against any kind of harmony or cohesiveness and will literally tear the fabric of our society completely apart to the point where it can no longer be mended or repaired. This seems to me to be the desired outcome of America’s LFE and they are much closer to realizing it than most of us can imagine.



Famed author and historian Samuel P. Huntington spoke to those issues in an article entitled, “The Hispanic Challenge(www.freerepublic.com),” and he did so bluntly and honestly. This, of course, caused him to be despised and hated by many and it is much to his credit that he didn’t seem to give a damn. He accurately noted that unlike, “past immigrant groups, Mexicans and other Latinos have not assimilated into mainstream U.S. culture, forming instead their own political and linguistic enclaves – from Los Angeles to Miami – and rejecting the Anglo-Protestant values that built the American dream.” He cautions that the, “United States ignores this challenge at its peril.” Additionally, over the centuries America has developed its own particular creed key elements of which, “include the English language; Christianity; religious commitment; English concepts of the rule of law and the rights of individuals; and dissenting Protestant values of individualism, the work ethic, and the belief that humans have the ability and the duty to try to create a heaven on earth, a city on a hill.” Huntington insists that historically, “millions of immigrants were attracted to the United States because of this culture and the economic opportunities and political liberties it made possible.”



The scholar explains, however, that beginning late last century, things began to radically change. He points out that in the, “final decades of the 20th century, the United States’ Anglo-Protestant culture and the creed that produced it came under assault by the popularity in intellectual and political circles of the doctrines of multi-culturalism and diversity. . .” Note Huntington’s choice of words here: assault as in attack. Assaults and attacks are not merely vagaries but have specific meanings as well as consequences. They are not simply happenstance or accidental occurrences nor are they the result of some form of societal evolution or progression. Assaults are purposeful, planned, and premeditated and if not challenged, they have predictable and negative outcomes. He also clearly identifies the leaders of the assault that America now faces: those in our intellectual and political circles. In other words, the FAR LEFT – the LFE. Make no mistake here. The assault Huntington referenced is now a full-fledged, all out war and traditional America is losing badly.



When the Unqualified One ran for office for a first term, he repeatedly promised to fundamentally transform America and this seems to be the only pledge he intends to fulfill. What he really meant but couldn’t say right out loud in front of God and everybody was that he intends to destroy this nation as envisioned by the Founders and presently constituted. He fully intends to destroy America as a limited constitutional republic in which government has specific, prescribed, and restricted powers beyond which it must never go. Obama and the LFE envision a country in which government is all powerful and all intrusive. He wants a system in which citizens must look to the government as the central focus of their lives and upon which they must depend for all of their wants and needs. There is no better way to accomplish this transformation than by constantly pitting group against group and special interest against special interest. This is Balkanization.



The piece notes that this is further being accomplished by encouraging, “the rise of group identities based on race, ethnicity, and gender; the impact of transnational cultural diasporas; the expanding number of immigrants with dual nationalities and dual loyalties; and the growing salience for U.S. intellectual, business, and political elites of cosmopolitan and transnational identities. The United States’ national identity, like that of other nation-states, is challenged by the forces of globalization as well as the needs that globalization produces among people for smaller and more meaningful blood and belief identities.” This is key, folks. With ever increasing immigration, especially of the illegal variety, we are indeed in danger of losing our national identity as Americans. Once that happens, full-fledged Balkanization of the United States is a virtual certainty. As more of us cease to think of ourselves as Americans, more of us will view each other as some form of “hyphenated” American. Our national identity will then quickly erode and eventually be destroyed. This process is well underway and is actively encouraged by those on the Far Left who view this country as a scourge and a blight on humanity. They don’t like America and feel no pride whatsoever in being American. They are the ones that clamor for open borders and feel that the movement to make English our official national language is but one more example of our intolerance, bigotry, and racism.



The author also points out the positive effects of limited immigration especially from south of the border. He summarizes the conclusions of the Commission on Immigration Reform and notes that, “Illegal entries would diminish dramatically.” Additionally, “The wages of low-income U.S. citizens would improve. Debates over the use of Spanish and whether English should be made the official language of state and national governments would subside. Bilingual education and the controversies it spawns would virtually disappear, as would controversies over welfare and other benefits for immigrants.” Can anyone who cares about this country and its future object to these positives? Furthermore, Huntington explains that, “the debate over whether immigrants pose an economic burden on state and federal governments would decisively be resolved in the negative. The average education and skills of the immigrants continuing to arrive would reach their highest levels in U.S history. The flow of immigrants would again be highly diverse, creating increased incentives for all immigrants to learn English and absorb U.S. culture. And most important of all, the possibility of a de facto split between a predominantly Spanish-speaking United States and an English-speaking United States would disappear, and with it a major potential threat to the country’s cultural and political integrity.”



The problem here is that those on the Far Left who control our major institutions desire these negative effects that our current immigration policies foster. Those folks do not want a united America whose citizens view themselves first and foremost as Americans who live in the greatest nation God ever gave mankind and who appreciate the vast blessings that accrue to them by dint of being U.S. citizens. This is the very last thing they want. They are globalists and one-worlders and view the concept of loyalty to and pride in the traditional nation-state as mere relics from our unenlightened past. They, of course, are ever so much more sophisticated and urbane than us doltish boors who still love America and all that it stands for. Care for just one small but instructive example of just how far we have moved away from traditional America? Sure thing. In 1917, Theodore Roosevelt declared that, “We must have but one flag. We must also have but one language. That must be the language of the Declaration of Independence, of Washington’s Farewell Address, of Lincoln’s Gettysburg speech and second inaugural.” In 2000, Bill Clinton, that paragon of virtue, said, “I hope very much that I’m the last President in American history who can’t speak Spanish.” Quite a contrast, don’t you think?



The Balkanization of our country is on-going, relentless, and threatens to tear this nation apart. The primary and most obvious example of this process is the American Southwest. There exist areas in that part of our country where English is just not spoken and the Mexican flag is easily as prevalent as is Old Glory. There are vast numbers of residents there who feel more loyalty to Mexico than they do to the United States and that trend continues to grow. There exist schools in the Southwest in which English-speaking children – American citizens born and bred here – are ridiculed, mocked, and even threatened. Most of the residents of Mexican origin feel the United States simply stole the entire region from their native land without factoring in such minor details as the Mexican-American War and the Treaty of Guadelupe-Hidalgo. They have simply transferred their language, customs, and traditions north of the Rio Grande and have absolutely no intention or need to assimilate and become Americans. Why should they? They read Spanish books and magazines, have no trouble finding Spanish language television and radio programs, and Mexican-Spanish restaurants and food marts abound. In New York City, a section known as Flushing is predominantly, perhaps overwhelmingly, Korean and the same conditions exist there as they do in the Southwest. Even street signs are printed in Korean. Cities like Detroit and its suburbs are becoming increasingly Muslimized and there are serious calls to introduce Sharia law in those localities. Similar situations exist in San Francisco’s China town. In the part of Brooklyn where I formerly worked for many years, you could swear you had somehow been magically transported to the Dominican Republic.



It is, of course, true that throughout our history new immigrants have tended to flock together and various ethnic groups usually staked out their own distinctive neighborhoods. There is nothing wrong in this and it is, in fact, perfectly natural. The difference between then and now is that most of those folks, all four of my grandparents included, became not only American citizens but truly Americanized. They deeply wanted to become Americans and adopt our customs, habits, patterns, and mores. They learned English as quickly as they were able, adopted American dress, and they worked. Back then, there was no welfare, hand-outs, or other so-called entitlements. Those immigrants felt that they were entitled to whatever they could earn and no more. The “Gimme” mindset had not yet taken hold and they expected nothing from no one. If they fell on hard times – and they did – they relied on family, friends, and neighbors to get them through or they turned to the neighborhood “settlement house”.



Compare that to what has taken place in America over the past five to six decades. In Mexico, for example, even before they cross our border the prospective immigrant, legal or otherwise, can get a booklet published by the government that instructs them on how to avoid U.S. border patrols, where they can fit in safely and comfortably, and which of our urban centers have been designated as “Sanctuary Cities.” The freebies and goodies they can receive are explained and they are instructed on how to acquire them. They do not want to assimilate and become Americans but instead attempt to replicate their homeland on U.S. soil. No nation can long survive in this fashion but given the fact that our leadership is spineless, weak, and overly adept at pandering and groveling, conditions have no chance of improving for at least the foreseeable future.



In the past and despite immigrants arriving from every part of the globe, America was a truly united nation. A piece entitled, “Illegal Immigration: The Balkanization of America(http://theamericandiscourse.blogspot.com),” notes that, “America survives because we are one nation; we share a common language, a history which ties us together. We live under a common flag which we honor, salute, and would die for.” The author goes on to point out that, “when you look at countries with bilingual and bi-cultural societies, you see histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Belgium, Malaysia, Pakistan, Cypress Canada, Germany, Lebanon, Nigeria, Italy, France, Burma, and more have all faced crises of national existence when minorities press for independence. Ethnic uprisings must be suppressed to prevent a divided nation.” Are we at that point yet? Apparently not but we are probably much closer than ever before. Animosity and strife between and among the various groups and interests in our society keep growing more raucous and angry every year. Those folks in charge, rather than diffusing tense situations, appear to relish nothing more than rubbing ever increasing doses of salt into already festering wounds. The author of the piece continues that countries, “must be bonded by similarities in culture, ideologies, and language,” and historically, “immigrants would assimilate quickly into American culture and provide a workforce to better our country.”



Well, that certainly was the case but now, “illegal immigrants flock to this country for work in such vast numbers that they no longer feel the need to conform to the standards of American society.” This has been true for a very long time and continues to get worse. All actions, of course, have consequences – some intended and some not. The piece explains that illegal aliens, “are a drain on the American system causing massive costs to society including but not limited to increased welfare costs, access for terrorists, escalation in crime, segregation, population booms, introduction of third world disease, lowered availability of medical resources, availability of illegal drugs, and a negative impact on education.” This by the way is just the short list and it’s way too long as it is. Those in charge of our society on both sides of the aisle are fully cognizant of these and other negatives but haven’t got the cajones to do anything about it. They know exactly just how badly fractionalized our country has become and that it presents a serious threat to America’s survival as a great nation and people.



With regard to illegal immigration, the author suggests some solutions that just might get him tarred and feathered in certain circles. He calls for the, “deportation of the masses of illegal workers which infest our nation,” because it, “is time to end the harboring.” Additionally, there must be, “a cut off of all public services offered to illegal aliens. They are not entitled to welfare, education, and healthcare for the simple fact that they are not citizens.” Yeah, bravo and good luck with that, pal. It is not, however, merely the illegal immigrant problem that must be addressed and corrected if the Balkanization of America is to be reversed. We must finally after all these years get control of legal immigration into this nation as well. Before 1965 when the Fat Drunk and his cronies stood immigration policy on its head, we let people into our nation only if it was to our advantage. The floodgates were not wide open as they are today. We picked and chose carefully who we would allow in. If someone from somewhere else possessed skills and talents that we as a country required at any particular time then fine, come on in.



Everyone else, however, is excluded – no exceptions – no mas! This is the way it used to be and it worked. Immigration was viewed as a method to help America continue to prosper and succeed and if immigration didn’t help achieve that goal then It’s Katy, Bar the Damned Door! As it stands now, too many of the world’s dregs find their way to our shores and contribute virtually nothing that benefits the United States. We must not first and foremost do something from the point of view of the potential immigrant or immigrant group. This country must be able to benefit from any immigration policy we adopt and not the other way around. Too many of us, however, seem to have abandoned any semblance of common sense as well as a love of country and the concept of American Exceptionalism. Until this is reversed, The Balkanization process will continue unabated.



In fact, the more multicultural and diverse we become, the quicker and more drastic will the fractionalization of our nation take place. A piece entitled, “The Ghost of Bertold Brecht and the Balkanization of America(www.familysecuritymatters.org),” insists that, “nations and peoples that are too open to outside influences risk losing their character and the uniqueness of their language, culture, customs and traditions. The ties that once bound strain and then break, as neighbors no longer know one another, communities lose their cohesion and factionalism becomes the norm.” The author notes that there, “are disturbing signs that the local, regional and national cohesion that once characterized Americans have weakened significantly.” Anyone who doesn’t realize the veracity of this statement is obviously walking around with his head firmly planted up his ass or has been living in a remote mountain-top cabin for at least the past five decades. As a nation, I very much doubt that we can coherently survive with so many disparate groups and interests competing for the limited resources we have. This situation obviously creates animosity and antagonisms that show no signs of abating but, instead, are being purposely exacerbated by all those with real or imagined axes to grind. The friction between and among the “diverse” groups does not bode well for America’s stability, unity, and future.



Those of us who have reached my age can clearly remember when the vast majority of students in America left school with a solid, working knowledge of our nation’s history and the certainty that we lived in a very special place unlike any other on the planet. We were and still are proud to be Americans. We knew how our government worked and functioned and were more than just slightly familiar with the Declaration of Independence, our unique and magnificent Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. This was considered to be both normal and necessary. We had become informed citizens with a direct and palpable link and attachment to America’s proud past. Look around you, folks. It’s literally gone. From elementary school to high school to college and university, it’s a rare thing indeed to find anyone with this type of knowledge anymore. These topics are now rarely if ever taught let alone learned. A people with no real knowledge of their past cannot possibly be proud of their nation and therefore are not nearly as attached to it as were former generations. A nation with no memory is easily susceptible to fragmentation, division, and even disintegration. A nation populated with hyphenated Americans is simply not a unified, cohesive place with a sense of purpose and pride. This is what America has become and is a major element in the increased Balkanization taking place today.



An article entitled, “The Balkanization of America, Part lll: Alone Together – The Failure of Assimilation(www.familysecuritymatters.org),” points out that, “not so many decades ago, Americans possessed a strong sense of shared identity. The typical man or woman on the street knew – and could explain in simple terms – what it meant to be a citizen of the United States. He or she could summarize the rights common to all Americans, and also the responsibilities and duties of citizenship.” Furthermore, author Peter Farmer points out that, “Thanks to widespread primary and secondary school instruction in civics and American history, most adults had at least a fundamental knowledge of our founding documents and traditions. The well-informed citizen knew important passages from the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and from famous speeches and orations. That citizen was also well-versed in U.S. history and knew the structure and function of the various branches of government.” Yeah, try to find this at any level of our society today and your frustration level will be beyond measure. A nation whose citizens cannot perform these rudimentary tasks of citizenship is ripe for Balkanization and we see it getting worse in America with every passing year.



This familiarity with our country’s past and a knowledge of our civic institutions, however, was not only expected from those born and bred within our borders but extended to new-comers as well. It has always been a crucial aspect of the assimilation process. The piece continues that even though, “a given American may have been born in another country, or raised in a home where English was not spoken, he was expected to learn the language of his country – and usually did so without complaint. Likewise, his teachers expected him to work hard to master English as soon as possible. Knowing the language was rightly seen as a gateway to economic opportunity and upward social mobility.” The piece asserts that the, “naturalized American sought to reinvent himself by shedding his old ways and habits and of adopting the ones of his new land.” Most of these newcomers, “aspired to fully American.”



This, tragically, is just no longer the case. American born citizens are not taught as they should be, naturalized citizens learn just enough to pass an extremely dumbed down citizenship test, and the growing number of illegals simply couldn’t give a rat’s ass. No country with a population thus described can survive as a unified, cohesive nation. It just simply isn’t possible and will lead to ever increased and acrimonious Balkanization. In the past, this was not the case. Immigrants were expected to adopt and conform to American values, mores, and norms. Not to learn the language of your new country was virtually unheard of and considered the height of folly and foolishness. In fact, “Prior to the 1960’s, new arrivals to the United States were expected to assimilate as rapidly and as fully as possible.” The article continues that with, “startling success, the Marxist cultural left has been able to flip old customs and practices on their heads; where once, the failure to assimilate was seen as shameful, today it has become respectable not to assimilate and hip to retain the customs and habits of one’s non-American country of origin.” This is merely one more aspect of Balkanization.



In fact, it has gotten so bad that many, “public schools no longer require civics or American history as prerequisites to graduation, and those that do require them offer such watered-down and/or flawed content as to make the courses useless or even harmful.” To make matters even worse, colleges and universities, “have gutted core curricula in the humanities, purging them of the classics of western civilization in favor of post-modern works explicitly hostile to the traditional values of the United States specifically and western civilization generally.” Our country is under attack as are our values, traditions, and heritage. Those on the Left are determined to rip this nation apart and turn it into something it was never intended to be and they are winning. It has gotten to the point that implicit, “in the new paradigm is the assumption that anything connected with the old order is flawed as too white, too European, too male and too dated to be of any value.” The author of the piece points to the fact that, “where schools once flew the American flag, taught children the Pledge of Allegiance and required the learning of civics, today these things are derided as insufficiently inclusive or xenophobic – and are no longer done.”



This is Balkanization, folks, and it is destroying our country.



Much Luv Y’all and Have a Great Day!

The Fifth Horseman

(Dr. David M. Rich, Ph.D.)











Thursday, January 31, 2013

THE FREAKING FRACKING FRACUS RANT


                                                                           

It seems that we are once again deep in the throes of still another dire environmental catastrophe that, of course, has the very real capacity – if not the absolute certainty – of devastating/destroying the planet. Since at least as far back as Rachel Carson and her Silent Spring in the 1960’s, the Far Left spearheaded by the “Environmental Wacko’s” have hysterically and predictably proclaimed that the end is nigh and Evil Mankind is once again the culprit. It is to yawn. Have you noticed, by the way, that none of these horrific predictions have ever come even close to fruition? Nada, Zip, Zero. Sorry, Rachel, but the song-birds still sing. Our water is still eminently potable and mankind has not overpopulated the earth to the point of mass starvation and extinction. None of this has happened and it won’t. The polar bear populations of the far north are healthy and growing as are the caribou herds, the Alaskan Pipeline notwithstanding. Anthropomorphic global warming has been conclusively repudiated and debunked despite the best and fraudulent efforts of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (see the Climate-Gate Rant of 12/20/09). Those on the Far Left and especially the Socialists in the “Environmental Movement” seem utterly dejected and disappointed that not only has Evil Mankind not been able to destroy the planet and our oh-so-cute furry friends but seem unable to accept the fact that environmentally, old Mother Earth is doing damned well despite her advanced age.



Not to be deterred by such pesky and annoying little things like facts and evidence, the Doom and Gloomers keep soldiering on. They seem convinced that we must immediately, if not sooner, abandon our use of fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas or the planet is utterly doomed. Instead, they champion those environmentally friendly “Alternative Fuels” like wind, solar, pond scum, and other so-called “Green” energy applications that will not harm the planet or place our feathered friends in jeopardy. How nice, save for the fact that they constitute no more than mere pipe dreams that in the real world are simply impractical, unworkable, and thoroughly utopian in nature and character.



There is simply no realistic way to ignore the fact that oil and gas constitute our most practical, efficient, and cost effective methods to produce the massive amounts of energy consumed by 21st Century Americans. There are simply no equivalent alternative energy sources in the foreseeable or long-range future. Perhaps one day many years down the road we’ll have developed technologies that will indeed replace fossil fuels but for at least the next couple of centuries, oil and gas are King. Can you imagine, for example, even in your wildest dreams a giant C-130 cargo plane powered by solar or wind power? No, you can’t. Can you conjure up images of huge ocean-going cargo ships or 150 car freight trains running on those same fuels? Again, the answer is no. Solar, wind, etc., constitute no more than hobbies at present and there is certainly nothing wrong with that. If, for example, I choose to heat my swimming pool with solar power, that’s fine. If my neighbor desires to produce electricity for his home by using wind power, then good for him. These examples, however, in no way constitute viable industries or even businesses. The demand for them just doesn’t exist and without demand there can be no product or service on a massive scale.



There has been virtually no private investment on the level necessary to make wind or solar power in any way or fashion practical, useful, or viable. Even when our government – read that taxpayer – subsidizes them with over half a trillion of our hard-earned dollars, alternative energy companies always fail. Remember Solyndra? That is not to say that research and development into these alternative fuels should not take place for indeed, it should but not at taxpayer expense. Let those who see a profitable and rewarding future in these technologies spend as much of their own money as they see fit on wind and solar projects. Let them attract as many investors as they can and work at realizing their dreams. Henry Ford did that, old John D. did that, as did Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and countless others. Perhaps you’ve heard of Free Market Capitalism? That’s the way it’s done in this country and it’s made us the wealthiest nation the world has ever seen because it works!



Risk-taking has always been a hallmark of the American experience, tradition, and character. It is literally part of our genetic make up, our DNA. It has defined us throughout our history going all the way back to those dauntless souls who took passage on the Mayflower and the pioneers who traveled west and settled this great nation. Risk-taking extends to creating the transcontinental railroads, the trans-Atlantic cable, Standard Oil, and U.S. Steel. It has allowed us to send men to the moon and back and it gave us Microsoft, Apple, and even your local deli on the corner. Without risk at some level, there can be no real reward and without the prospect of tangible and significant reward what’s the point of taking risks? The entrepreneurial spirit, that drive to succeed, has been with us since our inception and it constitutes a major element of the concept of American Exceptionalism. It appears, however, that the idea of taking risks is decidedly on the wane in the early years of the 21st Century. The old “can do” American spirit has seemingly been replaced by the “do it for me” philosophy championed by those on the Far Left in our country.

We seem to be far less self-reliant than in the past and far more passive and dependent than we have ever been. This attitude, fostered by the Socialist elements in our midst at every level of society, should be viewed as a major sea-change in our nation’s history and it is a change that bodes ill for America’s future. Dependency, especially on government largesse, seems to have become the norm in the American experience and psyche. Government hand-outs seem to be the wave of the future from the “Obamaphone” to food stamps to bailouts. As a matter of fact, it’s been projected that welfare – uh, I mean to say entitlements- will increase by 80% (11 trillion dollars) over the next decade! Does this sound like America to you? Does this sound like a people willing to rely on themselves to provide for their needs and desires? Does this sound like a nation of self-reliant, rugged individuals who really ask for nothing more than to be left alone to pursue their dreams regardless of how big or small they may be? No, I didn’t think so either. It sounds to me like our government is purposely and successfully creating a sense of dependency in America and dependency leads to complacency which always results in a sense of apathy and hopelessness. Once these concepts take hold of a majority of a nation’s citizens, no progress of any kind can be achieved and the country atrophies and eventually dies. This is inevitable and cannot be avoided once the majority have accepted and adopted these attitudes.



Has the United States reached this point yet or is my raging paranoia once again getting the best of me? No, for I believe that we have gone beyond the tipping point and have fallen off the precipice into the abyss of dependency, complacency, and apathy. My best evidence is the reelection of our Socialist-in-Chief to a second term. He makes LBJ and his Great Society seen like a mere piker and a rank amateur. Our nation has never seen more people on food stamps and the welfare rolls are burgeoning as never before. For the first time in our history government employs more folks than does our manufacturing sector and as a matter of fact, government is now the single largest employer in the country. Whatever happened to the Founding Father’s concept of a strictly limited government? It truly seems that a majority of Americans are perfectly content – even eager – to rely on government hand-outs rather than on themselves. We no longer seem to be a nation of risk-takers, of entrepreneurs, or self-reliant individuals who have faith in the future or that America’s best days still lie ahead of her.



This, then, brings us to the topic of this screed, fracking. What the Hell, you may ask, does the above discussion have to do with fracking? Everything. As is well known to all Americans, we are in the midst of yet another so-called energy crisis. Prices at the pump and the cost of keeping warm in the colder months easily bear this out. In my neck of the woods, the price of gasoline and home heating oil hovers at just under $4.00 per gallon and I’m told it’s a reflection of supply and demand. There just isn’t enough product out there to serve the needs of all those that require it to enable us to keep the costs down. It’s an economic reality, a fact of life and we’re just going to have to suck it up and deal with it. But suppose I told you that this is simply not the case and is in fact an outright, bald-faced lie foisted upon us by the “Enviro-Freaks” amongst us and their allies in the LFE (Liberal Fucking Elite)? I wonder what your reaction would be? I’d say it would be somewhere between total disbelief and utter skepticism. If this is true, you may ask, then why aren’t we doing something about it and why don’t more people know about it? Good and relevant questions, indeed. If these things are in fact true, then why are we importing as much as two-thirds of our energy needs from overseas and in too many cases from nations that absolutely despise the United States and all that it stands for? Why aren’t we well on the road to energy independence and self-sufficiency?



The fact is, that sitting beneath our feet and under our coastal waters is enough oil and natural gas to virtually end our dependence on others for our energy needs and, furthermore, the technology exists for us to harvest these resources economically, profitably, and cleanly with little if any negative impact on the environment. I give you Hydraulic Fracturing or Fracking. Now, I’ve been told and you’ve probably heard from people who seem to know what they’re talking about (but don’t) that there’s simply too much risk involved in the process and therefore should not be undertaken. I’ve been warned that it might contaminate our drinking water and despoil the environment. I’ve been informed that the process of fracking will increase the cancer rates in America and will cause massive and horrific earthquakes and may even stimulate volcanic activity and who the Hell needs that?!?



Yeah, I’ve been told all these things and more but no one’s been able to show me credible – or even incredible – evidence or proof that there’s any real risk of the predicted catastrophes actually occurring. Each time I’ve been warned of the possible risks involved in fracking, I also consider the source. Without fail and exactly 100% of the time, the source is invariably a person or organization that is tied to the Far Left in this country, the Enviro-Freaks, or both. Every single time I’ve challenged their assertions-allegations, I’ve been screamed at, cursed at, called names, and been treated with utter contempt, disdain, scorn, and derision. When these folks fail to provide even the slightest support for the charges they bring, they invariably fall back on platitudes like, “Well, it might happen,” or, “Hey, it could happen,” so why bother to take the risk? That’s an attitude that flies in the face of our history and experience. Why bother to take the risk, indeed? How about to reap the untold and incredibly positive rewards that will accrue from fracking? How about to finally become truly energy independent rather than dependent?



Hell, with this mindset why should any of us get out of bed in the morning or step into the tub and take a shower? We may trip, fall, and break a leg. Why bother to drive our cars or board an airplane? We might end up dead. Why bother to start or expand a business? We might fail. Why bother to risk asking her out? She might say no! In the minds of these fools, it’s better not to take the risk if it might lead to failure. Better to maintain the status quo even if the status quo is unsustainable, untenable, and negative in the extreme. Folks, if this attitude had prevailed back in the 1770’s, there never would have been a free, independent United States of America. If this had been our attitude for the last two hundred and thirty some years, we would not have become the wealthiest, freest, most powerful, and most generous nation the world has ever seen. If the “Why-Take-The-Riskers” have assumed the ascendancy and majority among us, then our nation is irretrievably lost and in no way resembles the America we grew up in and have Come to love so much. That attitude reeks of failure and an end to progress on any and all levels you can think of. That attitude bespeaks of a change so vast that it can correctly be termed as un-American. It belies such stalwart American characteristics as optimism, hopefulness, and an unfaltering and unwavering belief in our continued greatness. It embodies the antithesis of American Exceptionalism.



Apparently, this is where we are in America today and it’s exactly where those on the Far Left have purposely taken us. It’s been at least fifty to sixty years in the making but they are both patient and insidious. The last thing they want is for America and Americans to be energy independent or independent in any aspect of our lives. Independent nations and people are free and self-reliant whereas dependent people and nations are in fact enslaved by a ruling elite who expect nothing but subservience, compliance, and resignation. Dependent people are easily led and controlled while independent types tend to think for themselves and act in their own best and self interest. Dependency leads to a malleable and moldable population that is easily cowed and coerced into doing the bidding of those who hold the reins of power. The last thing they want is an independent population/nation. They must have the citizenry dependent upon them and the nation dependent upon foreign entities many of which despise this country. They are, after all, globalists and one worlders who assign more legitimacy to international organizations like the United Nations and the World Court than they do to our own institutions like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. They want America to fail and in fact need America to fail. They truly believe that the United States achieved its level of success by raping and looting the rest of the planet’s natural resources and that we have subjugated the so-called People of Color world-wide. We are the cause of failed and failing nations in what has come to be termed the Third World and we must be made to pay for it. Anything that accrues to America’s advantage must be fought and defeated. Energy independence? Can’t have that for it doesn’t come close to fitting their anti-American template and therefore we can’t possibly allow fracking because that process would once again give America an edge!



An article entitled, “Energy Independence and its Enemies(www.commentarymagazine.com),” explains that fracking, “is the shorthand term for hydraulic fracturing,” and makes possible, “the extraction of oil - natural gas in particular - from shale rock formations thousands of feet underground. A mixture of water, sand, and chemicals is pumped downward and sideways at high velocity. It fractures the rock and releases gas upward to the surface.” Author Abby W. Schacter explains that, “fracking portends nothing less than the potential re-industrialization of the U.S. economy,” and that the, “cumulative impact of new production . . . and associated activity may increase real GDP by 2.0 to 3.3 percent.” Well, so far I don’t see any reason to be particularly alarmed by the process but let us continue with our due diligence. A piece entitled, “Fracking feasible if practiced safely, responsibly(www.campustimes.org),” explains that, “Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a drilling technique that uses a high-pressure mixture of water, sand and chemicals to break apart rock and free natural gas.”



Uh-oh, wait a second. Both sources sited thus far have explained that the fracking process employs the use of - OH, NO – chemicals! Well, there it is then. Fracking must immediately be brought to an abrupt and screeching halt for to continue would be akin to waging chemical warfare against Mother Nature and anyone who disagrees with this conclusion must be shunned, scorned, ridiculed, and shamed. After all, if you are in favor of fracking then ipso facto you must want to destroy and pollute the planet, rape our environment, and despoil all that the “Greens” love and cherish. Boy, you Frackers out there are some really evil, cold Bastards and should at the very least be exiled to some remote island somewhere or maybe even be summarily executed. Use chemicals, indeed! Author Brett Chenoweth apparently and wisely disagrees. He notes that there is, “concern about the undisclosed chemicals used in fracking,” but explains correctly that, “Fracking is a regulated activity, and concerns over the chemicals are not being ignored. For this reason, I do not see this as a large cost, as it has a very small probability of causing any damage to people or the environment.” Additionally, Mr. Chenoweth suggests, “that we frack, but responsibly and safely, making sure to set a standard procedure and safety process. The technology and techniques are only improving with time, so this should not be an unachievable goal. It will allow us to reap the benefits of fracking while maintaining a level of environmental integrity and safety.”



The only question I have for old Brett here is why would he assume anything else? We have become a nation of regulations, regulators, and regulated and the field of fracking is certainly no different. It would be sheer insanity on the part of those in the industry to do anything but act responsibly, safely, and prudently for that would endanger the endeavor, invite government reprisal, and would certainly reduce whatever profits are to be gleaned from the process. It would be the height of folly and foolishness because it would fly in the face of the self-interest of those engaged in the process and would be anti-capitalistic in the extreme. Oh, of course, I get it now and should have seen it immediately. Those who oppose fracking are, in fact, anti-capitalistic, anti-American, and Socialist. They despise the concept and view Capitalism as the single most evil socio-economic system ever devised by evil mankind(see the Morality of Free Market Capitalism Rant of 12/1/11).



So, then, what about these immoral and dastardly Frackers who would despoil our environment and rape Mother Nature with their noxious and deadly chemicals? I mean those guys plan to deploy nothing less than full-blown, all out chemical warfare against our precious planet. Only degenerate and depraved Capitalists could sink so low. There’s obviously no other explanation. An article entitled, “The Big Fracking Deal(https://sites.google.com),” speaks directly to this issue. The piece explains that, “you will notice chemicals that are used everyday such as household cleaners, swimming pool cleaner, table salt, thickeners used in cosmetics, glass cleaner, and many more.” Who among us does not have such products in the cabinets under the kitchen sink, in the bathroom, or out in the garage? I would venture to guess that the answer is virtually no one. According to the article, one such common compound used in Fracking is acid. Oh, Heaven forbid! Not ACIDS!! Apparently, the purpose of acid is to help dissolve minerals and aid in initiating fissure in rock. One of the most common existing reasons for using it is to clean our swimming pools. So, if you’ve got one of them or use a municipal facility you’re literally swimming in the stuff! Next up we see some horrific sounding thing called Glutaralde-hydrade which just sounds dangerous and hazardous to living things. This horrible chemical eliminates bacteria in water, is a disinfectant, and is used to sterilize dental and medical equipment. Oh, no – not that!



Care to take a look at a few more chemical agents that are employed in the fracking process? Sure, no problem. Moving right along, we notice something called Sodium Chloride which allows delayed breakdown of the gel polymer chains. Well, Mother of God, we sure as shit can’t have that! You know, common table salt found in just about every household in the nation. Now, your doctor may have warned you off the stuff but not because it’s going to destroy the planet or contaminate our drinking water! Next up on the list, we come to an item called Non-Dirrethyl Formarride which prevents pipe corrosion and is currently employed in pharmaceuticals, acrylic fibers, and plastic – all useful items, don’t you think?



Do you begin to get the point, folks? The scaremongers out there mention the word chemical and identify them by their formal, scientific names in order to frighten and confuse us. If they charged that table salt, the stuff we use to flavor our food with, will cause planetary destruction they’d be heckled right out of the room and they know it! If they came out and stated in plain English that the stuff used in fracking helps sanitize and clean our swimming pools, they’d be laughed off the stage! As all good members of the LFE, they employ fear tactics and play on our emotions. You know, if you are not against fracking you obviously must hate the planet and want to see it despoiled and destroyed. Gimme a Fracking break! Unfortunately, there are far too many of us who are easily frightened and have been literally brainwashed and bamboozled into believing that modern technologies are in and of themselves innately harmful, destructive, and constitute harbingers of doom.



Well then, let’s continue for just a bit longer examining what the Evil Fracksters have in store for us. They use in their capitalistic quest to make money and employ Americans such items as: Borate Salts – found in laundry detergents, hand soap, and cosmetics; Petroleum Distillates – used in make-up remover, laxatives, and candy; Guar Gum – currently employed in cosmetic thickeners, baked goods, ice cream, toothpaste, sauces, and salad dressing; Potassium Chloride (Oh, no – not that!) – which is nothing more than a low sodium salt substitute; Sodium Potassium Carbonate – used in soda, detergents, soap, water softener, glass, and ceramics; Ethylene Glycol – employed in antifreeze, household cleaners, and caulk; and Isopropanol – for glass cleaners, antiperspirants, and hair color. The article highlights other chemicals necessary and useful for the fracking process, but I believe the point is made. Those that are against fracking are attempting to instill an irrational fear into an ignorant and gullible population. They are attempting to prevent progress, stop economic growth and prosperity, and leave the American citizen in such a state of gloom and despair that they will turn to our government – to Big Brother – to protect and save us from the horrid profit mongers in our midst. You got it – more government dependence and less and less self-reliance and confidence in the future.

Alrighty then, the fracking process uses common, ordinary household chemical products. There’s nothing particularly exotic, outlandish, or extreme involved here and if their use can help us become energy independent and provide employment and prosperity for who knows how many millions, then fracking should be universally applauded and adopted. Not to do so seems to me to be the absolute height of foolishness and irresponsibility. Wait there just a minute, Skippy, retort the doom and gloomers. Just hold on there, Buddy, not so damned fast! They may grudgingly agree that the partial list of chemicals presented thus far may not mean an end to our planet or environment but what about the nation’s WATER SUPPLY, they shriek!?! Do you really want things like disinfectants, detergents, antifreeze, and glass cleaner leaching into and infecting our precious ground water? Well, do you?!? They claim that it will happen just as surely as the sun sets at night and rises in the morning. It’s inevitable. They conclude, therefore, that the Fracksters want to pollute and poison our water thereby killing our precious children and their cute little puppy dogs! How evil can you possibly get? The anti-frackers out there seriously make the charge that those in the Fracking Sector are willing to poison our drinking water in the name of Evil Profit and I really believe that they have absolutely no idea how ridiculous, ludicrous, and illogical they sound. They seem to assume that those in the Fracking Industry are too stupid and ignorant to understand the possible risks that fracking may present or they are convinced that those in the industry are so cold and callous as to not even give a damn about the risks as long as they’re turning a profit.



The investment in the process is huge and there’s a lot of money riding on its success and acceptance by the public. Without public support and approval, the industry is destined to fail. If the public generally held the view that fracking would mean large-scale contamination and pollution of our drinking water, there is no chance in Hades of it ever really succeeding and the fear-mongers know it. That is why we hear a never ending cacophony and chorus of anti-fracking going on out there. These folks are purposely attempting to instill fear and panic among the general public much as they have successfully and falsely done about America’s nuclear industry. If their anti-fracking propaganda is nearly as successful as their anti-nuclear propaganda has been then fracking is dead in the water. Kaput, finished, through! This, of course, is the desired outcome. Both of these technologies would virtually guarantee American energy independence and those members of the LFE out there simply can’t have that. It can’t be tolerated much less even contemplated. That would be seen as pro-American and they simply are not!



Let’s briefly look into the controversy about fracking and our water supply. First of all, according to the last mentioned source, fracking, “requires the use of more water than traditional shallow vertical wells, ranging between three and five million gallons of water per well.” Now, that’s a shitload of H2O! This water use, of course, leads to the charge that the fracking process will consume so much of the stuff that in time there will not be enough water left for human and animal consumption or for growing crops. All, of course, in the name of Evil Profit! Once again, the Gloomers and Doomers either have no idea of which they speak or they are purposely spreading lies into frightening the citizenry into rejecting the entire practice. As noted earlier, fracking is a heavily regulated industry and, “gas producers must identify and obtain permits from the state regulatory agencies to withdraw water from streams or rivers, with additional oversight on limiting water withdrawals to protect fish and aquatic life.” Like all other industries in America, the frackers simply can’t do as they please on a whim.

Additionally and as always, the anti-Fracking Forces ignore new technological developments that significantly cut down on the over use of our precious water supply. It seems that new, “technologies, however, are allowing producers to recycle much of their water,” and that on average, “producers reuse nearly 60 percent of their water, and this figure is expected to grow even larger. In some cases, “producers are recycling 100 percent of their water.” Furthermore, the entire fracking process, “requires continuous monitoring to ensure the safety of workers and the protection of the environment.” The piece also refers to a point made earlier by recognizing that natural gas companies, “invest millions of dollars to develop a single well. Protecting that investment through a safe operation and successful completion is the first priority for every well drilled.” Finally, the level of water consumption must be placed in its proper perspective. Yup, fracking uses a whole bunch of the stuff. Referring to Pennsylvania, the article notes that the, “the industry will only be using a tiny portion of the state’s water consumption of 10 billion gallons per day – this is less than what is used for recreational purposes, such as golf course irrigation in the summer months.”



All well and good, you say, but what about the concept of contaminating and polluting our water supply with the noxious chemicals discussed above? Well, as a previous sources noted, “there have been no confirmed instances of water contamination,” as of yet. Does this mean that it can never happen? Of course not, for as suggested a number of times in this screed there is risk involved in any and all human activities or endeavors. Does that mean that the risk is not worth taking and that progress should be abandoned because we have become too afraid to assume any risk at all? That’s no more than a prescription for defeat, failure, and an end to progress, development, and hope for the future. A piece entitled, “Fracking is Misunderstood, It’s the Key to Energy Self-Sufficiency(www.forbes.com).” explains that, “Fracking activities take place deep underground, well below the water table. . .” Did you get that? It’s simple and easy to understand. The process takes place nowhere near our water supplies so the chances of chemical pollution seem fairly remote at best. But still, maybe we should abandon the technology because, after all, something might go wrong somewhere, somehow, sometime.



Author Halah Touryalai makes an interesting and insightful comment when she notes there, “is far too much inaccurate information about fracking being circulated by people calling themselves environmentalists,” and suggests that an EPA, “study would hopefully resolve these issues once and for all.” While she apparently recognizes that there is in fact an entire pant-load of lies and misinformation being disseminated about fracking by the “Greens” amongst us, she obviously places far more faith in government’s abilities and intentions than do I. EPA, indeed! That’s an organization populated by those on the Far Left, the LFE, and Socialists. I’m willing to bet the ranch that any study of fracking put out by the EPA would have only one resounding resolution: shut it down!



According to the Hill which is the official news organ of the U.S. Congress the possibility and danger of chemical contamination is remote. In an article entitled, “Fracking Innovations Enhancing Energy Independence(http://thehill.com),” we learn that more, “than a million wells have been ‘fracked’ since the technology was introduced more than six decades ago,” and that, “Fracking takes place a mile or more below drinking-water aquifers and is separated from them by thick layers of impermeable rock.” The article recognizes that there are concerns about a process called flow back – water that flows back to the surface after fracking has taken place – but and as always, “experience and innovation are leading the way,” in dealing with any problems from that source. Author Bonner Cohen explains that additives, “containing the BTEX family of chemicals have been eliminated from the product lines used in fracking. BTEX – benzene, tolvene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes – are the volatile organic compounds found in petroleum and dies, once a staple in fracking, has been replaced by much more environmentally friendly mineral oil.” The author correctly insists that, “Technology doesn’t stand still. Today’s innovations, which are making fracking cleaner and safer, will be superseded by tomorrow’s breakthroughs.”



That last statement constitutes an utter and absolute truism. Those of us on the “Right” firmly know and believe this. It is we Conservatives who have an all-abiding faith in man’s ability to progress and overcome problems that are encountered in any field of endeavor. We tend to recognize but not dwell on problems that arise and instead focus on finding solutions to them. We believe in man’s ability to keep moving forward no matter what the obstacles. We look back on the amazing and, historically speaking, breakneck pace of developments that have vastly improved the lot of mankind and see no reason to abandon or curtail our optimistic attitudes regarding America’s future. It is those on the Far Left in this country that are the pessimists, the gloom and doomers. They are the ones that have absolutely no faith in man’s ability to progress and improve conditions in this country. They are the ones that do not trust the individual to take care of themselves and their families. They are convinced that the mass of humanity must be led around by the nose. They insist that every conceivable aspect of life be micromanaged by a massive, centralized, out of control government peopled and staffed by an arrogant, condescending elite who are, of course, far better equipped than us common slobs to run our lives and dictate the terms of our existence. They have absolutely no faith or confidence in man’s ability to make correct decisions or create innovative solutions to the myriad problems life throws at us. Yet, they label themselves as PROGRESSIVES! Progressives, my sorry old ass!! They are against fracking because it represents progress, innovation, and most importantly because it will enhance America’s position in the world and this they cannot abide.



Merely debunking the myths and lies about fracking perpetrated by those on the Far Left is not enough to get a sense of just how beneficial it really is and what it will actually do for individuals and communities in this country. For so many years, for example, we have in America been bombarded and inundated with horror stories pertaining to evil Carbon Dioxide and the dangers of global warming. Well, those who constantly predict planetary destruction due to that phenomenon should be elated at the prospect of hydraulic fracturing for it significantly reduces CO2 emissions. That’s right, folks. While the Environmental Freakazoids have been able to do absolutely nothing about it, the Evil Capitalists out there have by pursuing profit through advanced technology.



An article entitled, “Fracking Provides an Array of Benefits(www.mariettatimes.com).” informs us that, “Hydraulic fracturing is improving energy outlook and reducing carbon emissions.” How about that, huh? The piece goes on to say that,

“At this point it’s becoming almost impossible to deny the environmental benefits increased natural gas is providing in the United States.” In fact, “its increased use in power generation has enabled the U.S. to reduce carbon emissions to 20 year lows, dropping to 1992 levels.” In fact, the International Energy Agency notes that the, “U.S. has led the world in carbon reductions since 2006 thanks to increased natural gas made possible by hydraulic fracturing.” Environmental benefits, however, constitute just the merest tip of the ice-burg. Author John Krohn explains that in Ohio, “studies show that it supported 1.5 million jobs and over $1 billion a day in economic activity last year.”



Not only is fracking revving up employment at a time when unemployment levels are still unacceptably high, it is breathing new life into what were assumed to be moribund and dying industries. A piece entitled, “It’s time to Develop Our Natural Resources in America(http://resourcefulearth.org),” informs us that, “Hydraulic fracturing – fracking – is revitalizing a number of American businesses that had previously been stagnant or forced to relocate to other parts of the globe.” Furthermore, “The shale gas revolution is firing up an old-fashioned American industrial revival.” The piece sites a number of examples from Ascension Parish, Louisiana. It explains that Methanex Corporation, a chemical plant that shut down its last plant in America in 1999 is spending over half a billion dollars to dismantle a plant in Chile and will move it to the Louisiana parish.



Additionally, the Williams Petrochemical Company is spending something like $400 million to expand an ethylene plant and, “CF Industries unveiled a $2.1 billion expansion of its nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing complex, aiming to displace imports that now make up half of U.S. nitrogen fertilizer sales.” Those, of course, are but merely a few examples of a phenomenon that is increasingly taking place all over the nation thanks to fracking. The article accurately maintains that across the country companies like those cited, “are crediting the sudden abundance of cheap natural gas for reviving up their U.S. operations,” and that the, “shale gas revolution is firing up an old-fashioned American industrial revival, breathing life into businesses such as petrochemicals and gas, steel and toys.” As far as I can tell, folks, fracking seems to be a win-win for everyone and I’m convinced that the only ones opposed to it are those that do not wish to see America grow and prosper because they intensely dislike, if not actually hate, this country. I can find no other explanation for their fracking objections other than a pronounced anti-American bias and prejudice.



The benefits of fracking so far outweigh any negatives that one must wonder about the motives of those who are against it. The objections to the process cannot be grounded in reality, fact, or reason for they are supremely irrational, irresponsible, and reveal an amazing level of ignorance, hysteria, and irrationality. Their attitudes display a complete lack of faith in the future and a pessimism that is literally foreign to America’s history and experience. Their views fly in the face of common sense as well as nationalism. One Allen Gilmer wrote a piece entitled, “10 Reasons Fracking Improves American Lives(http://info.drillinginfo.com),” which clearly and concisely lays out the case for hydraulic fracturing. He notes, for starters, because of fracking the, “price of oil is 20% lower than what it would be otherwise,” and that, “natural gas prices in America have plummeted over the last 5 years. As a result, natural gas is at least 80% cheaper here than the rest of the world.” Any objections thus far? Good, let’s keep going. The author points out that, “low gas prices have led to America’s first new industrial build in 40 years,” and for, “the first time in many people’s lives, our manufacturing sector is growing,” and that, “American energy independence is possible for the first time in history.” All this and more is directly attributable to fracking and yet there are still those out there who vigorously oppose it.



Moving right along, we note that by, “reducing our dependence on foreign oil, we won’t have to send untold amounts of money to governments who don’t have our best interests in mind, particularly in the Middle East.” Think about that. No more being held hostage by a bunch of oil-rich sheiks halfway around the world who view us as no more than the Great Satan! Furthermore, “we have reduced our CO2 contribution over 200 kilotons per day,” and we have, “unlocked a vast energy resource while remaining environmentally responsible.” Indeed, “thanks to fracking, Oil & Gas is perhaps the only robust industry that is hiring at every level. We offer high paying jobs and pay far more of our income as taxes and fees than virtually any other industry.” Yeah, that fracking stuff is just one giant negative! In addition, “every year, drilling leases bring multibillion dollar transfer payments to rural and agricultural communities across America.”



Fracking seems to be a huge positive for this nation and its citizens. If we let the modern-day “Luddites” amongst us win and shut down the process we will be witnessing the end of American independence and hegemony and it will usher in a period of deep malaise and hopelessness that may see the end of America as founded and currently constituted.





Much Luv Y’all and Have a Great Day!

The Fifth Horseman

(Dr. David M. Rich, Ph.D.)































Sunday, October 14, 2012

The Nanny-State In America Rant




When I hear the term “Nanny,” I conjure up an image of a very prim and proper English spinster whose job is to raise and protect the children of the wealthiest of the British upper, upper class. Our Nanny runs the household, supervises the staff, and is always the very soul of virtue and respectability. First and foremost among her awesome responsibilities is to see that absolutely no harm, physical or otherwise, befalls the offspring of the upper crust Brits in her charge. After all, the future leaders and rulers of the “Empire” must be protected at all costs regardless of the hardship and sacrifice to be endured. I’m not really sure just how close my stereotypical characterization comes to hitting the mark never having had the opportunity to experience or witness it first hand. For myself, I wouldn’t want my young ‘uns raised that way but it’s really a very personal issue and I sure as Hell don’t think I have the right to tell others how to raise and bring up their Rug Rants as long as it doesn’t interfere with me and mine. After all, I suppose the Nanny performs a service that is needed and desired by those who can afford it and do not want too much interaction with those they chose to bring into this world. Good for them, I guess.



When I hear the term “Nanny-State,” however, my reaction is vastly different and overwhelmingly negative. The Nanny-State and the Nanny-Staters do most definitely interfere with me and mine and this is simply unacceptable and not to be tolerated in any manner, shape, or form. These folks and their philosophy are reprehensible and pose a clear and present danger to all those who value freedom and independence. Those who believe in this tyranny euphemistically known as the Nanny-State represent the very antithesis of choice, free will, and personal responsibility. To a man and woman they have nothing but contempt and loathing for the American way of life. They deeply despise our traditions, institutions, and even our own history. They are authoritarian in the extreme and ardently believe that most Americans constitute nothing more than the, “little people,” who cannot think for themselves or act in their own best interests. According to them, we simply lack the intellectual prowess or acumen to make decisions for ourselves and live life as we so choose. We need to be led around by the collective nose and be told what we are to do regarding every single aspect of our lives no matter how seemingly insignificant and inconsequential. They believe in a philosophy that might be termed, “For Your Own Goodism,” and are utterly convinced that they constitute the “Enlightened Ones” who will paternalistically make all of life’s decisions for us. You see, only they are qualified to do that.



In our country, the devotees of the Nanny-State are members of an exalted Far Left niche known as the LFE(Liberal Fucking Elite). They are really nothing more than extreme Socialists and absolute statists. They believe in micromanaging every and all aspects of life in America from how it is governed right down to what each individual can and cannot eat and drink. They are “Cradle to Gravers” and will provide all of life’s necessities and desires whether we approve or not. They treat the American citizen much like an overbearing and bombastic parent treats small children. In that type of environment, they need never make decisions and never have the luxury of choice. The tyke will listen and obey or face serious consequences meted out by the adults who control his or her every action, movement, and thought. The youngsters grow up without free will and never learn to mature and take responsibility for their own actions and mistakes. They are taught that without the parent, they will never and can never succeed. They are not taught to think independently and for themselves but rather are forced into a position of complete dependency and reliance upon others for everything and anything they will ever need, have, or want. They, therefore, can never become adults in the true sense of the word but rather are forced into a type of permanent adolescence and can thus never become independent, self-reliant, and free.



This is exactly what the Nanny-Staters desire for the American citizen. They want us ever so compliant and obedient to their world view and, like children, we are to be seen but never, ever heard. A compliant, obedient population is easily controlled and managed. A docile and passive population is ever so malleable and moldable and is easily persuaded or coerced into doing the bidding of a self-proclaimed and anointed “Master” class even if it is patently harmful and inimical to its own best and self interest. The LFE, the Nanny-Staters, are creating an entire population of lemmings who will blindly rush off the cliff even if it means their own demise. They are easily swayed and led because they cannot think for themselves and make rational decisions and choices. They blindly follow no matter where they are being taken and this is exactly where those on the Far Left want our nation to go. It appears that so many more of us have come to rely on government for our every need that the very nature and character of the United States has been forever subverted and destroyed. Virtually gone are defining American characteristics like rugged individualism, providing for oneself with no outside interference or force , and a boundless optimism in the future that has driven so much of this country’s unparalleled success. American Exceptionalism has seemingly been replaced by the concept of American Mediocrity and too many of us have been taught – brainwashed – into believing that mediocre is the most we can expect or strive for. This is certainly not the America I grew up in nor is it the one I want to leave for my children and grandchildren.



How, then, is the Nanny-State defined? A web-piece entitled, “Nanny State (http://en.wikipedia.org),” explains that the term, “conveys a view that government or its policies are overprotective or interfering unduly with personal choice.” The same source also notes that according to Dictionary.com it means, “A government perceived as authoritarian, interfering, or overprotective and has also come to be associated with socialist practices of having the government basically baby the populace by being in charge, in control of, and even financing all of its needs.” Those descriptions seem an apt characterization of life in the United States in the early 21st Century because we are becoming rapidly less self-reliant and ever more dependent upon government largesse much as the masses of ancient Rome relied upon their elite for their very survival. At times, I fear that we have already walked so far down that path we many never find our way back.



The American Heritage Dictionary (www.ahdictionary.com), explains that the Nanny-State is a, “government perceived as having excessive interest in or control over the welfare of its citizens, especially in the enforcement of extensive public health and safety regulations.” Encyclopedia.com explains that the Nanny-State means, “government institutions and practices of the Welfare State collectively, perceived as overprotective, interfering, or excessively authoritarian.” Can anyone say Obamacare (see The Obamacare Rationing Rant of 4/15/12)? Can we all say massive new taxation? Huge and failed government bailouts? Unaccountable and unelected government Czars? Massive and useless government “stimulus” packages? Our sorry excuse of a leader and his cronies are nothing less than extreme anti-Capitalists, anti-American collectivists and Barry Boy Obama is our Socialist-in-Chief. Everything he has done and will continue to do comes at the expense of our liberty, our freedom, and our independence and it’s being perpetrated upon us by design, on purpose, and with tremendous malice aforethought!



As I look around and see what is happening to my country, I am ever more convinced that we are living in a real, live version of George Orwell’s famous novel, 1984. I never thought we’d ever confronted by an actual “Big Brother” bent on controlling every facet and aspect of our lives from the simplest to the most intricate and personal. Well, apparently I couldn’t have been more hopelessly wrong and naïve. This is what happens when so many of us stop vigilantly and jealously protecting and preserving our hard fought for rights and freedoms. They gradually slip away and are lost to us forever never to be regained. That’s what Nanny-Statism and the LFE are all about and that’s all they’re about! That’s all that Obama and the Boys are all about.



He and the other Socialists in our midst know full well that they can’t stage a third-world style military coup in this country so they rely on a strategy known as incrementalism. They chip away at our liberty and freedom ever so slowly – just a little bit at a time – so that we barely notice the slow erosion until one day we wake up to find that the beach is completely gone swallowed up by an unrelenting and unstoppable ocean! Alright, we say, so this mayor says I can’t have salt and that one says that we can never consume trans-fats while some other self-appointed guardian of my health insists that I can no longer smoke. These are such little things, right? Wrong! They represent a true loss of freedom and choice. They represent government micromanagement of our very existence and deciding what is and is not good for us much as the parent of a young child carefully and thoughtfully selects what the tyke can and cannot eat or drink, where he can and cannot go, and with whom he may and may not associate.



I hope we all had these kinds of concerned, responsible parents but I have news for the Socialists and Statists out there: the government makes for one damned lousy Mom or Dad and as far as I’m concerned is guilty of extreme child abuse when it gets this involved in our everyday lives! This is absolutely not what our Founding Fathers envisioned all those years ago. They foresaw a nation of free responsible adults more than capable of making their own decisions and acting in the best interests of themselves, their families, and their communities! Those folks expressly created a strictly limited government which is why the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were included in our Bill of Rights (No, you can look ‘em up if you’re so inclined). Well I gotta tell you, a government that can regulate or forbid my salt intake or force me to wear a helmet while riding a Harley or a Schwinn is by no stretch of the imagination in any way limited!



You care for a few examples of just how far the Nanny-Staters have succeeded in implementing their agenda and completely subordinating the individual to the will of those who would control and regulate our every waking – and sleeping – moment? Certainly, you got it. A piece entitled, “18 Examples of the Nanny State Gone Wild (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com),” perfectly illustrates just how far we have moved away from the Founders’ vision of a strictly limited and nonintrusive government of, for, and by the people. The article points out, for example, that one Michael Bloomberg, New York City’s Mayor with a pronounced Napoleonic Complex, “has announced that he wants to ban all large sodas and sugary drinks in order to fight obesity.” Where the Hell does the Diminutive One get off dictating what size beverages we can consume? He seems to be reacting to the so-called problem of childhood obesity that I’ve been hearing so much about recently. Hey, Mike, here’s a news flash for you. My family’s girth is absolutely none of your damned business! I guess New York City must be doing really well if this is what the Mayor deems a top priority. Give me a freaking break and mind your friggin’ concern!!



Wait, for it becomes even more ridiculous and nonsensical. In a place called Minnetonka, Minnesota, “you can be fined up to $2,000 for having a muddy vehicle.” A muddy vehicle? In Hazelwood, Missouri, it is “against the law for little girls to sell Girl Scout cookies in front of their own homes,” while over the “past couple of years there have been quite a few instances all over the country where lemonade stands run by children have been shut down by police because the children had not acquired the proper permits.” Proper permits? Lemonade? Let’s see, here we’ve got a bunch of enterprising kids building some sort of stand, offering a perfectly legal product to folks in their neighborhood, and hopefully making a few bucks! They are learning first-hand and early about satisfying consumers, profit and loss, and the problems to be overcome when starting your own business. Can’t have that, now can we?



The article further points out that in, “many states it is now illegal to collect any rain that falls on your own property,” and that in San Juan Capistrano, California, “it is against the law to hold a home Bible study without a conditional use permit.” Hmmm, if I understand this you can’t have a bunch of folks over at your own home to discuss the Bible. You need government permission to discuss religion with like-minded friends and acquaintances? This sounds very close to Totalitarianism to me and absolutely nothing like the nation I grew up in and have come to love so much. Furthermore, in Hilton Head, South Carolina, “it is illegal to have trash in your car,” while in Louisiana, “one church was ordered to stop passing out water because it did not have the proper permit.” Additionally, “at public schools all over the United States, the lunches that little children bring from home are now inspected to make sure that they meet USDA guidelines.” I’ll tell ya, if any damned school official tried to inspect and then confiscate the lunch my mother had packed for me those folks would never have gotten over it and then they’d have to deal with my father when he got home from work. It sure as Hell wouldn’t have been pretty!



When taken as individual, isolated instances, the Nanny-State examples proffered thus far don’t seem all that ominous. When viewed collectively, however, they can only be seen as extremely menacing and freedom-destroying designed to subordinate the individual and the family to the whims of an ever increasing pernicious and pervasive Statism that will, if left unchecked, destroy this nation as envisioned by our Founders and as presently constituted. There can be no doubt about that whatsoever. The author of the piece correctly maintains that at, “at this point the nanny state has become so oppressive that it is strangling the life out of us. If you look back throughout history, the societies that have really thrived have had a very high degree of liberty and freedom. When the bureaucrats get the upper hand, it can suck the life out of any economy.” It really doesn’t take much analysis or observation to realize that the professional bean counters, pencil pushers, and paper purveyors have gained the ascendancy and they along with the LFE in America have changed for the worse what used to be properly termed the American Dream. They are rapidly turning that dream into a Hellish nightmare!



The piece correctly notes that our, “rights are being stripped away a little bit with each passing day, and we are being told that we need a permit or a license for almost everything. Many younger Americans have been living this kind of straight jacket existence for so long that they don’t even remember what real liberty and freedom are.” In fact, we “are steamrolling down the road to totalitarianism, and most Americans don’t even realize what is happening.” The piece also speaks to something that I find more than just a tad worrisome and if my fears ever come to fruition, it can mean nothing less than the destruction of the United States and everything it stands for and represents. It seems to me, that far too many of my fellow citizens are completely unaware or are not even slightly troubled by government’s intrusion into our daily lives and activities.



They seem to view this ever growing encroachment, this increasing attempt to exert more and more control over everything we do as just no big deal. Americans have always jealously and passionately defended and guarded our precious rights and freedom. It seems, however, that this is no longer the case. It appears that far too many of us have become dangerously apathetic and cannot connect the dots between an ever more powerful government and a loss of freedom and liberty. We are allowing our nation to be destroyed without even putting up a fight or voicing and objection. Apparently, we have become so fat, lazy, happy, and stupid that we don’t even recognize the dangers we face. As the piece concludes, “Sadly, there are many Americans that actually agree that the state should regulate nearly every detail of our lives. There are many Americans who actually believe that life is better when there are millions of rules that we all have to follow. There are too many of us who sincerely believe that too much liberty and freedom is a bad thing.” Finally, the author concludes that, “if we are not careful the control freaks are going to destroy this nation. They always tell us that the rules that they are imposing upon us are for our own good, but every time they lay another burden on our backs they just suck a little bit more life out of us all.”



Implementing the Nanny-State is the goal and battle plan of the Far Left in the United States and they are not at all shy about what they want. They need to smother and stifle us with so many rules and regulations that we’ll literally drown in them. The hope of the LFE is that most Americans will simply throw up their hands, give up the fight, and raise the white flag of surrender. They hope we’ll just go along to get along, stop resisting, and simply give in to the Liberal destruction of the United States. Americans, it seems to me, no longer have the will, stamina, and determination to endure a long and vicious fight. This is what they’re counting on and hoping for. They want us to become too tired and worn out to keep the battle between Liberalism and Americanism going and that we’ll just go away resigned to our fate. They want to wear us down to the point that we simply no longer have the energy to keep on defending and fighting for our precious freedoms, institutions, and way of life.



The LFE among us think in the long term and if it takes 20, 30, 50, or 100 years they’ll keep fighting to implement America’s demise until they emerge victorious. No fight is too small for them to wage and this is why we see so much of the Nanny-State being constructed at the local and community levels. When Nanny-Statism is the norm at the town and community levels, it will move in a coordinated fashion to the state and national stage. That strategy may be termed the “trickle-up” implementation of Nanny-Statism but the “trickle-down” theory works as well. If they can implement their agenda on the national level as in Obamacare then it will spread to every level of society from the top down and this is equally effective.



For example, “in the United States it is illegal to operate a train that does not have an “F” painted on the front. Apparently without that “F” we all might not know where the front of the train is.” I kid you not folks and you simply can’t make this stuff up. That’s how stupid and moronic those on the Far Left actually believe the rest of us “Little People” really are! How about this for all you damned Socialists out there? “F” You!! Additionally, I’m willing to bet that you had no idea that in, “America today it is illegal to milk your cow and sell the milk to your neighbor. If you do this, there is a good chance that federal agents will raid your home at the crack of dawn.” Furthermore, it is, “illegal to give a tour of the monuments in Washington D.C. without a license.” Let’s see, your Aunt Tilly and Uncle Jasper from Podunk, Iowa, have come to visit and you’ve planned a trip to our nation’s capitol to show them the sights. They’ve always wanted to see the Washington, Lincoln, and Jefferson Memorials and they’ve even brought their camera to record their visit. Watch it, Buddy, for you are now guilty of the heinous crime of touring without a license and there’s gonna be Hell to pay! Furthermore, “In the state of Alabama, bear wrestling is completely illegal,” while in, “Fairbanks, Alaska, it is illegal to give alcoholic beverages to a moose.” Listen, if some damned fool wants to wrestle around with a bear, that’s his own business but I’ve gotta tell ya, I’m greatly relieved at the prospect of not having to deal with the all pervasive and overwhelming societal dilemma of drunken moose! I’ll sleep better just knowing that. The author of the piece concludes that, “This is not what our Founding Fathers intended and this is not what America is supposed to be about.” Yuh think!?!



There is really only one word that sums up the total effect of the myriad rules, regulations, and laws that seem to control an ever expanding area of our everyday lives. It can be defined as no less than out-and-out and undisguised oppression. We are no longer ruled by an absolute monarch by are indeed ruled by an absolute ideology that is no less tyrannical than the potentates of yore. The breaking point for Americans back in the 1770’s was the onerous Tea Tax that was arbitrarily dictated to the colonists and about which they had no choice – or so thought the royal authorities. Come on, you all remember the rallying cry of, “No taxation without representation!” I’m sure you do. Well, I’d be willing to bet the ranch that children and young adults from elementary school right through college are completely unfamiliar with battle slogan for, sadly, it is no longer even taught. The powers that be do not want our youth to learn that at some period in our history, there was a point at which the average citizen stood up and yelled, “No, you’re not doing this to us!” There’s virtually none of that spirit of freedom and independence left in America and we seem to have become a nation of sheep eagerly waiting to be shorn. We face a tyranny today no less harsh and freedom-denying as did folks back in 1776 but it is not the fault of some foreign monarch in a far off, distant land who demands to be obeyed.



No, unfortunately it is our own fault. The people who would enslave us now and destroy our freedom and liberty are fellow Americans. They are Socialists, statists, and absolutists who are every bit as dangerous as were the old Divine Right Rulers of centuries ago. They are the main components of the LFE and are Hell-bent on destroying our rights – all of them. They will not rest until the only choice we have left is blind obedience to the whims of an elite class to which the vast majority of Americans are forever denied entrance. We are here only to do the bidding of our so-called enlightened “betters”. Anymore than that will not be tolerated, expected, or permitted by those on the Far Left. You see, those extreme Liberals have no desire to govern but rather prefer to rule with an iron fist and a hob-nailed boot! They do not believe in uniquely American institutions like separation of powers, federalism, or limited government and in fact do all they can to first weaken and then destroy them until the land of our birth is utterly unrecognizable and completely unfamiliar.



The Nanny-State and its big government proponents, of course, could not exist without a base of support. No group or ideology can succeed unless a very large percentage of the electorate is willing and eager to support its policies at the ballot box. The key to understanding how and where that support comes from is to realize that creating dependency in America is a huge priority for those of the LFE. Without a completely dependent and non-thinking constituency, advocates of the Nanny-State could never possibly succeed. Without a huge and multiplying class of dependents, Socialists like President Barry Boy could never have been elected let alone stand a damned good chance of getting re-elected. In the last four years, we’ve experienced more government interference and meddling into our lives than had ever been imagined by all other American Presidents combined. I have read that just in the year 2011, our Usurper-in-Chief created and put into place over 70,000 new rules, regulations, and restrictions that we all must obey or face the consequences. This will seem like a mere drop in the bucket once that horror show known as Obamacare is fully implemented. The monstrosity runs into thousands of pages and virtually no one in America has read it or comes even close to understanding the consequences it will have for the citizens of our soon to be once great nation. Remember, the Affordable Health Care Act has nothing whatsoever to do with the state of our health or our health care system. It is about nothing but control, power, and a tremendous loss of personal freedom and that’s all it’s about.



A piece entitled, “Government or Business (http://mjfellright.wordpress.com),” truthfully points out that if, “re-elected, the current White House occupant will continue to use class warfare as an excuse to reduce and eliminate taxes on political groups inclined to elect proponents of nanny state huge government programs.” If this trend continues, “eventually a majority of Americans will no longer pay taxes.” Right now, apparently, approximately half of the eligible population pays no taxes and there exist fewer and fewer of us out here to carry the load and provide the necessary funds to keep the country going. This can only mean that the administration, “will increase the tax burden on successful businesses and individuals.”



This is simply part and parcel of the Socialist mind-set: punish success and reward failure. It is completely ass-backwards, unproductive, and dangerous to the continued existence of the United States. As a matter of fact, “The majority of people will not care how much tax rates rise. Since they will no longer be paying taxes, higher tax rates will not affect them.” This being the case it is obvious that as, “businesses fail under the added tax burdens, more people will be laid off and require government assistance. This will create a huge underclass of Americans dependent upon government for survival who will exist under government control.” The author ominously warns that, “This is not coincidental.” This is key, folks. What’s happening to America is no mere accident or happenstance. It’s part of the Nanny-State philosophy, structure, and strategy. It is purposeful, well thought out, and planned and is being executed brilliantly and relentlessly. If the Saboteur-in-Chief is granted one more term, our nation as we have come to know and love it can’t possibly survive in any meaningful or recognizable form.



There can be no escaping that conclusion. The train wreck we are rushing toward will be like nothing America has ever witnessed or experienced including the Great Depression and two world wars. What we are heading for will make those cataclysmic events seem like a Sunday picnic in the park. The Nanny-Staters know full well what’s coming and they eagerly, passionately, work for its implementation. It matters not a whit to them that what they advocate has failed miserably every where and every time it’s been tried. They are well aware that the Socialist Nanny-State model has completely destroyed the economy and social fabric of virtually all of Western Europe but they are sure they can get it “right” in America. They are fully cognizant of the fact that as, “more people become dependent on government, fewer people are left to pay the cost. It goes deeper and is far more dangerous than that, however, because, “the socialist entitlement mentality makes more people less productive. As more and more people become less and less productive, an ever-smaller minority of productive people become responsible for shouldering the burden of a completely lopsided, unfair system.”



Not surprisingly, “when a tiny number of productive people are required to deprive themselves of the fruits of their own labor in order to finance the lives of the remaining population, where is the incentive for them to produce?” There is none. There is nothing to be gained financially, socially, or psychologically and this is where the Nanny-Staters want to take us. As more and more Americans realize that there is really no reason to work hard or take risks and start a business more and more of us they fervently hope will simply give up and become dependent upon an all-powerful, all-pervasive, and completely intrusive government. The piece concludes that, “reliance on a big nanny state makes people less responsible for themselves, less self-reliant,” which is, “the antithesis of the American way of life.” That’s where we’re presently headed if those Bastards are not thoroughly and overwhelmingly defeated!



Most of us want to leave to our children and grandchildren a better America than the one we were born into but the problem has become a definitional one. Just how does one define the term “better?” Those on the Far Left define it as restricting and limiting individual choice and freedom in favor of something vaguely termed, “the Greater Good.” They demand that the individual subordinate his own needs, wants, and desires to that entity known as the STATE. All action, ideas, and outcomes will come from the top down instead of going from the bottom up as was intended by the Founding Fathers. In their view, society’s basic and most important unit was the individual citizen for whom the government worked and served. The free individual did not work for the government or the state but rather the opposite was true. The government exists to serve the needs of the citizen and before our revolution rocked the world, that was simply unheard of. For thousands of years of human history, the individual existed solely to serve the needs of the state and the very few elites who ran it. We the people counted for nothing but existed as merely the tiniest cogs in a huge machine. Most folks today are still governed according to this philosophy and mind-set while we, in fact, remain one of the few exceptions to that rule. The Nanny-Staters of the LFE fully concur with the view that the individual counts for nothing. If individual citizens are allowed to freely act or express themselves, that can only be seen as a threat to the state’s power and control over the rest of us. This, of course, must in no way ever be tolerated.



These people want us to display nothing but obedience for that will ensure their total control over all of our activities from the smallest to the largest. How bad is it getting? Far worse than most of us could have possibly imagined. A piece entitled, “Nanny State Betrays Decline and Fall of America (www.infowars.com),” speaks directly and succinctly to that point. Writer Paul Joseph Watson explains that in New York City the, “Department of Health has slapped strict regulations on anything deemed risky recreational activities conducted by programs or organizations.” Well, that’s certainly vague enough to cover anything you can think of isn’t it? The piece notes that activities most of us grew up with are now verbotin. The growing list includes: wiffle ball, dodge ball, kick ball, freeze tag, red rover, frisbee tossing, and tug of war which have all been placed under the new Big Brother rules. Wiffle Ball? Dodge Ball? Now just try and tell me that the Nanny-Staters out there are about anything but control, conformity, and a loss of freedom and choice.



Banning such classic children’s activities as these clearly illustrates just how pervasive and intrusive government has become. They will tell you that these games are being black listed to prevent harm or injury from befalling the “children,” but that is merely a smokescreen. All of these games involve some element of risk and the Nanny-State Socialists are trying to eliminate all elements of risk-taking from our lives and instead replacing it with a government provided blanket of security that will keep us from all harm. Hey guys, I got news for you. Life itself involves risk and in the real world there’s always going to be some harm. To shield our young ones from these facts of life does them no favors and can only prevent them from growing up into reasonable, responsible adults who are not afraid of venturing out into the world and experiencing it as it actually exists!



Additionally, the activities cited above all involve elements of competition which by necessity means that there will be winners and, of course, losers. Most adults know that we can’t win all the time and therefore by definition we will occasionally lose. Again, it’s part of life and the Socialists among us simply can’t have that. They believe in a society where there are no winners and losers but rather everyone is the same. Ain’t equality great? If those Far Left Liberals can grab our kids at the earliest possible age and inculcate them with these beliefs they will develop into nothing more than mind-numbed robots marching in lock-step to do the bidding of the state. This, by the way, is nothing unusual. In ancient Sparta, for example, children were removed from the home and parental care at the tender age of seven to be raised, educated, and brainwashed by the state. By the time Sparta was done with them, they were truly obedient and loyal servants to the whims of an all-powerful and pervasive system that despised anything resembling freedom of thought, initiative, or individuality. This is exactly what happened in Communist China centuries later when the Great Leader Mao of the Little Red Book took the helm. Children were removed from parental control and turned over to the government to be raised and molded by a system that minimized the importance of the individual and severely stifled any form of free will or thought. This is exactly and precisely the goal of the Nanny-Staters and the Far Left in America today. The article further points out that age old favorites like Capture the Flag and Steal the Bacon are also forbidden in the Big Apple. Once again, we see the concepts of competition, winning and losing under assault but to introduce the ideas of Capturing and Stealing? Unthinkable and unacceptable on any level.



The article explains that this, “is all part of the process of the state replacing the parents as guardians of the children and it is designed to ensure that kids become nothing more than drug-addled, dependent slobs with no energy and no life experience, perfectly molding them to grow up as obedient, video-game playing, Clockwork Orange-style Droogs.” The writer is absolutely correct in his assessment of where our nation is headed and there are those of us out here who feel we are rapidly reaching the point of no return. The piece concludes that these, “examples barley scratch the surface of the nanny state offensive that has been launched as part of the establishment’s social engineering programs.” The author further informs us that the, “state is deliberately being extreme in its smothering takeover of society so as to shock and awe Americans into obeying without question. The move is akin to how a stallion horse is castrated and gelded in order to alter their behavior by making them more docile.” The analogy is absolutely spot-on for Americans have indeed been castrated by an increasing intrusive and absolutely out of control central government. Watson correctly insists that these, “developments represent a total power grab on behalf of the federal government as it bids to become the supreme authority over Americans from cradle to grave. This is about a complete transformation and re-engineering of society,” and warns that it, “is imperative that Americans re-assert their individuality and the right to make their own choices and live their lives as they wish by resisting every encroachment the state makes as it tramples personal freedom.”



In an article entitled, “A free ride courtesy of the Nanny State (http://silvie.com),” the ever irascible yet irrepressible Bill O’Reilly remembers that when he was young, “most everybody worked. No one was on welfare,” and in fact, “just 6 percent of Americans received welfare payments in 1962.” By contrast, now more, “than 100 million of us are getting money from the government, and that does not count Social Security and Medicare, programs workers pay into.” This is not an example of government or societal compassion but rather government control and dependence. As that giant government umbrella inexorably covers more and more of us, it is impossible to escape the conclusion that it can only mean a concomitant loss of freedom and autonomy. The individual is being rendered inconsequential and impotent while the power of the state grows exponentially. This must result in negative structural changes to the United States that can only bode ill for the future.



The author continues that what, “we are seeing is the rise of the Nanny State,” and that, “self-reliance and ambition made the United States the most powerful nation on Earth. But that ethic is now eroding fast.” In fact, “Presiding over and joyously encouraging this societal shift is the purveyor of social justice President Barack Obama.” O’Reilly correctly posits that, “We are creating a dual society: In one corner: Americans who work hard to succeed. In the other corner: Folks who want what you have.” It seems more and more that the latter group is growing rapidly while the former is dwindling away at a dizzying and fearful rate. Dependency and unproductivity are becoming ever more the norm while self-reliance and the age old can do spirit of America has morphed into let the government do it for me! What too many Americans seem not to recognize or appreciate is the fact that once government does more and more for you, it will then inevitably do more and more to you. To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson: a government that is powerful enough to give you everything you want is also powerful enough to take away everything you have!



I wonder just how long it will be before we begin hearing and seeing news stories informing us that the police power of the state will begin to monitor how our children spend their recreational time? You know – how, where, and under what conditions will our children be allowed to socialize with kids their own age? Will the Nanny-Staters actually become that invasive and intrusive? Will the parent, the child, or both be punished by the powers that be if the young ones are allowed to recreate in ways that do not meet with state approval? Will we see the creation of a Playtime Czar if the Bamster is reelected? How about a full-blown Cabinet position entitled something like the Secretary of Kiddy Entertainment and Activity? Will thousands of official guide lines, rules, and regulations be issued from the White House detailing and specifying just where, when, and how our children’s social activities can be overseen by government ministers, snoops, and spies? I know, I know, it’s just my raging paranoia bubbling and boiling over again and I might benefit from getting back on my “meds” and seriously increasing the dosage!



You think so? Pay attention. A piece entitled, “Cops Interrogate Family for Allowing Kids to Play Outside: Social Services harass mother for having free range children (www.infowars.com),” should serve as a warning shot across all of our bows. The piece informs us that a, “family has been harassed by social services and police for the egregious crime of allowing children to play outside,” and constitutes yet, “another example of how the Nanny State is running wild in America.” You may want to read that last just one more time and reconsider exactly how paranoid I really am. It appears that a Virginia mother, “was interrogated by police four times and visited by social services twice after her children were spotted playing outside unsupervised.” Oh no, not that! The parent at the very least must be sent off to an official Nanny-State Reeducation Center to have her mind made right!! Mom explained she is, “one of only two families that allows my children to play outside at all in our neighborhood (which is very safe).”



Well certainly, something must have been drastically wrong. The “offense” probably occurred at two or three in the morning and obviously the miscreants must have surreptitiously snuck out of the house unbeknownst to the parents of these aspiring juvenile delinquents. When the cops showed up at 4PM on a Saturday afternoon, her 10 year-old ran home to tell the folks that he and his siblings had been busted. The husband went out to see what the problem was and found an officer was writing a report, “stating that the children were left outside unsupervised.” Forget about the fact that the kids carry cell phones and must check in with Mom and Dad every half hour, “the mother was told by her neighbors that it just isn’t safe anymore to allow your kids to play outside.”



I guarantee you that it was the neighbors who called the police and ratted Mom out! Well, she asked the police if her children – consisting of two teens, a pre-teen, and a five year-old – had misbehaved or caused trouble? The officer responded, “No, they were very respectful kids, I just wanted to make sure they were okay because it was odd seeing them outside unsupervised.” Think about that statement for a moment. A cop was just not used to seeing children playing outside by themselves. What does that tell you about where our society has come and where it is going? The author queries, “How fundamentally warped has society become when children are not allowed to play outside in a field right next to their own house without suspicion being cast on their parents by authorities and neighbors?”



Welcome to the Nanny-State, America, and I hope to Hell you enjoy it!



Much Luv Y’all and Have a Great Day!

The Fifth Horseman

(Dr. David M. Rich, Ph.D.)